Saturday, November 24, 2012

Emerging Issue: Globalization and Global Stratification


            As defined by the Levin Institute at The State University of New York globalization is, “a process of interaction and integration among the people, companies, and governments of different nations, a process driven by international trade and investment and aided by information technology.” Globalization can be seen as a good thing. Through social media, other new ways to communicate, and new transportation modes the world has become a much smaller place. We can no longer view the nations of the world as separate and independent societies. We are now able to communicate with people across the world and we are now able to travel to anywhere in less than 24 hours. But with globalization, comes global stratification. Global stratification is “the systematic inequalities between and among different groups within nations that result from the differences in wealth, power, and prestige of different societies relative to their position in the international economy” (Anderson, Taylor 212). Theories such as the World Systems Theory, the Modernization Theory, and Dependency Theory help explain the concept of global stratification and bring to perspective the idea that globalization isn’t all good.  
            Before all the theories there are the facts of the divisions that are clearly visible in today’s world. As defined by the book we have semiperpheral, peripheral, and core countries. Core countries are countries such as the United States. These countries have vast economic power and control and profit the most from the world system of global stratification. Semiperpheral countries are countries like Turkey and Mexico that are somewhat industrialized. These countries represent what we would think of as a “middle class” (Anderson, Taylor 215). Lastly, there are the peripheral countries. These countries are what we would think of as the lower class. They are the poor, agricultural countries of the world. These countries tend to have vast natural resources, but they are unable to use them themselves because they are exploited by core countries, which in turn keep them from developing further keeping them in poverty. Another way to view this system is to think of first, second, and third world countries. First world countries are the core countries, second world are the semiperipheral countries, and third world countries are the peripheral countries.
            In sociology, theories such as the World System Theory, the Modernization Theory, and the Dependency Theory help us understand how global stratification came about. As well as giving us more understanding of the global inequality seen around the world. According to the Modernization Theory economic development “arises from relinquishing traditional cultural values and embracing new technologies and market-driven attitudes and values” (Anderson, Taylor 217). Based on this theory countries remain in poverty as a result of holding on to traditional values. Therefore the society is prevented from competing in the modern global economy. The Dependency Theory on the other hand suggests that economic development comes from the most powerful countries exploiting the least powerful countries, where the powerful countries then gain control of the political and economic systems of the least powerful countries. This results in the least powerful countries remaining in poverty due to their dependence on the wealthy nations that exploit them. Lastly there is the World Systems Theory, which in some ways similar to the Dependency Theory. This theory explains economic development as a result of “the development of a world market that links core, semiperipheral, and peripheral nations” (Anderson, Taylor 217). This theory states that poverty stems from core nations “extracting labor and natural resources from the peripheral countries” (Anderson, Taylor 217).
            Globalization has created great progress in the world. Advances in trading, migration, the spread of diverse cultures, travel, and much more can be included into the benefits of globalization, but there is no doubt that globalization is contributing to the inequality between nations; in addition to the exploitation of some nations by other countries.


News Article:
Just How Powerful is a 'Made in America' Tag? - Alexandra Thomas
http://www.hlntv.com/article/2012/10/21/buy-products-made-america-us


References

The Levin Institute - The State University of Ne. (2012). What is Globalization. In Globalization 101. Retrieved November 20, 2012, from http://www.globalization101.org/what-is-globalization/

Andersen, M. L., & Taylor, H. F. (2011). Sociology: The Essentials (Sixth ed., pp. 212-232). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning

No comments:

Post a Comment